Canadian
rail companies getting tough new rules to track maintenance issues
Published: August 28th 2009
Source: By Terri Theodore - Canadian Press
VANCOUVER, B.C. — For nearly a decade, countless Canadian freight trains
traversed the continent on potentially faulty wheels -several of them derailing
as a result - while recall "shortfalls" by Canadian National Railway and
inaction by Transport Canada hamstrung efforts to get them out of service.
Now, Ottawa is cracking down on Canadian railways to force them to keep track of
their parts in hopes of eliminating the systemic problems that allowed the
wheels to remain in use for more than eight years.
Legislation is being drafted to impose tough tracking requirements on the rail
industry, similar to those already in place for aviation companies, Transport
Canada spokeswoman Maryse Durette told The Canadian Press.
"We didn't know which cars had been maintained or which wheels ended up where,"
Durette said.
"Now, the railways (will be) required to record for traceability all freight car
major components, including the wheels, through a data-collection initiative
with industry."
The new rules were prompted in part by defective wheels manufactured in a
Canadian National Railway shop in Winnipeg over three years beginning in 1998.
The wheels, blamed by the Transportation Safety Board for a series of
derailments dating back to June 2000, have proven maddeningly difficult to track
down.
By last year, the safety board had blamed the wheels for at least 18 different
derailments. None were fatal, but some 100 cars went off the tracks.
It wasn't until June of last year that Transport Canada issued a rare directive
ordering that the wheels be identified and removed from Canadian trains. The
department cited "shortfalls" in CN's earlier two attempts at recalling the
wheels as the reason for the directive.
"In my opinion, there remains an immediate threat to safe railway operations,"
Luc Bourdon, director general of Transport Canada, wrote in a letter to CN.
Kelli Svendsen, a CN spokeswoman, declined to be interviewed by The Canadian
Press, but said in an email that the company has complied with all requirements
to track specific equipment components, such as the recalled wheels.
"Although the vast majority of wheels have been inspected and changed out as
required, each month CN reports to Transport Canada on the progress of wheel
inspections and several railroads are assisting CN with completing the
inspections," the email said.
But even now, it remains unclear whether all of the wheels are out of service in
Canada, and even less so whether they are still being used on rail lines
elsewhere in North America.
Indeed, no one knows where the wheels are or how many might be out there, said
Ian Naish, the TSB's director of rail investigations.
"We would just be guessing," Naish said. "It doesn't look they're all in, that's
for sure."
The problems began in 1998 when the Transcona shop modified its boring process
to try to solve a wheel-misfit problem. Not long afterward, CN noticed a number
of loose or out-of-gauge wheels on its freight cars.
CN linked the so-called "loose-wheel phenomenon" to the modified boring process
as early as 2001, according to a report released last year by the board, which
investigates air, rail and marine incidents in Canada and makes safety
recommendations.
By then 48,000 sets of wheels had gone into circulation, both on CN trains and
on trains operated by many other railways around North America. As is standard
procedure in the railway business, the wheels were frequently switched between
cars during reconditioning and repairs.
In February 2002, the company informed the federal Transport department about
the defect, but did not notify other railways.
CN attempted to remedy the problem on its own by sending two wheel recalls to
North American rail companies with the help of the Association of American
Railroads.
The recalls were issued in November 2001 and February 2002, but the safety board
concluded in a report released in 2008 that those recalls were "limited and
incomplete."
The recalls targeted just over 14,000 tank cars with wheel mounting dates in
1998 and 1998, even though the faulty wheels were made up to 2001.
The TSB report examined a CP Rail crash in January 2006 where the wheels were
blamed for an accident that sent 12 freight cars off the tracks near Buckskin,
Ont., a two-hour drive north of Toronto.
Had the industry been further informed about the faulty wheels, the report
concluded, car fleets could have been inspected and the wheels removed from
service, instead of being reconditioned and put back on other trains.
By the end of 2007, CN estimated there were still as many as 12,000 of the
defective wheels in service, but because rail companies don't keep track of
their parts no one could say where the wheels were.
"The inability to quickly locate defective wheel-set components increases the
risk of failure, which can lead to derailment," the report said.
Durette said the forthcoming legislation is still being drafted and will include
all Canadian railways. It's not clear whether it will be a strict as similar
rules for aviation companies.
For aircraft, detailed records must be kept pertaining to the manufacture,
identification and maintenance of every part.
A brief description of any work performed on the part is required, along with
the date of maintenance and the name of the employee involved, a description of
any defects found, any work still to be completed and any other pertinent
details.
Transport Canada is now satisfied that all the defective wheels are out of
service in Canada, said Durette.
"CN says they're satisfied that all the wheels are off their CN cars," she said.
"They've been identified and removed. There's the same possibility that some
wheels might have made their way onto U.S. cars, so that's why there is an
Association of American Railroads advisory in place."
The Transport Canada directive was distributed to 34 other railways that may be
using the defective wheels, but there's no way of knowing if those wheels are
still on the tracks somewhere in North America.
Both CN and Canadian Pacific Rail have been through their fleets looking for the
faulty parts, but there's no doubt some are still rolling under trains from
other North American companies, Naish acknowledged.
www.teamstersrail.ca