
Published: March 1st 2009
Source: Shawn Micallef
SPECIAL TO THE STAR
Printer friendly version
What kind of investment pays
dividends almost forever? Solid infrastructure, suggests one stop on
a Spacing editor's rail-linked exploration
Standing on Fort York's south ramparts, eyes shut, it's easy to
imagine Lake Ontario is only a few metres below. The hum of the
Gardiner Expressway even sounds like the surf. But open your eyes
and the freeway looms on its concrete columns, and you must look
between condominiums to catch a glimpse of the distant water.
On the north side of the fort are hints of why we have Toronto terra
firma where the shoreline once was. Nearly a dozen rail lines cross
Toronto near this spot; one branch heads along the lake towards
Hamilton, the other curves northwest towards Weston and Georgetown.
The latter follows some of the historic Grand Trunk Railway route,
Toronto's first railway.
Soon, the 19th century route responsible for so much of the city's
early growth may play a key role in the evolution of 21st century
Toronto, by serving as backbone of the long-sought rail connection
between Union Station and Pearson International Airport.
The name Grand Trunk still sounds expansive; it is a reminder that
after the War of 1812 railways, not armies, started to decide
Toronto's future. The Grand Trunk would grow, as planned, into a
main trunk line – becoming for a time the world's largest railway
system – and finally morph into CN. But when first built, the Grand
Trunk did not even cross what is now downtown Toronto. It swung down
toward the lake from the northwest and stopped at a terminal on the
south side of Fort York.
Evidence remains, in impressive earthworks visible between the fort
and Strachan Ave. In the shadow of the Gardiner near here is an old
trench that was dug west to Strachan, where it curves north and now
disappears, with few traces, under modern Liberty Village.
The Grand Trunk was originally chartered as the Toronto & Guelph
Railroad Company, and became part of plans for a railway between
Toronto and Montreal and southwestern Ontario. Between 1853 and
1856, lines were built in two sections: Toronto to Montreal and
Toronto to Sarnia. Engineer Casimir Gzowski was the contractor of
the western section, and his Grand Trunk accomplishment is one
reason the lakeside park west of Sunnyside bears his name (he is
also the great-grandfather of the late CBC broadcaster Peter Gzowski).
The large terminal yard for the Sarnia line was constructed in front
of Fort York on eight hectares, about half of which was landfill,
thus beginning the shoreline's slow move south to its current point
across from the Toronto Island Airport.
More than anything else, the railways were responsible for the
extension of Toronto's waterfront, because they had the political
and financial muscle to get what they wanted (the term "railroaded"
means what it does for a reason). There was a gap between the Sarnia
and Montreal sections of the GTR for only a short time before the
railway bullied Toronto City Council into letting it lay tracks
across the front of the city along the newly created Esplanade,
marking the beginning of the city's estranged relationship with its
waterfront. In the late 1850s, the view from the Fort's bastions was
still of the lake, but also of a busy Victorian industrial scene.
TODAY'S PEARSON RAIL connection proponents may wish they had
the same bullying power their 19th century counterparts did. The
various schemes proposed – such as the early Blue 22 line that
involved diesel trains running regularly between Union and Pearson –
have met with opposition in Weston. Now part of Toronto, Weston
flourished once the Grand Trunk was established in the1850s. One
proposal for the Pearson link would have closed some surface
streets, threatening to cut the community in half. The trains are
welcome, says the Weston Community Coalition, but "Let's build it
right the first time" by burying the tracks and creating a Weston
station, as there is with Go Transit – ideas that made it into later
proposals.
Such discussions were unheard of when the Grand Trunk was built. The
Fort York yard itself was formed by dumping fill behind a line of 62
massive timber "cribs," filled with dirt from Garrison Common (a
vast tract of land that included what is now Exhibition Place and
the residential neighbourhoods to the north of the Fort) and from
the GTR cut itself.
Archeological issues were not considered then, so the railway was
able to carve its trench through the heart of the 1813 battlefield.
That's the equivalent of doing the same thing through the Plains of
Abraham in Quebec or Gettysburg in Pennsylvania, and it's probable
that the fill still contains cannonballs, artifacts and even human
remains. The site is so important, historically, that the City of
Toronto is seeking to have Fort York recognized as a World Heritage
Site, which would be the first such designation in Ontario. As for
the railway itself we tend to either take it for granted or else
complain that the tracks cut the rest of the city off from the lake.
David Monaghan, curator of the House of Commons and former curator
of the land transportation collections at the National Museum of
Science and Technology, says that "One of the great tragedies of
Canadian Industrial and Transportation history is that so little
remains of the original infrastructure that played a critical role
in the development of the first railway networks in Canada."
WITH THIS SENTIMENT in mind, that lonely trench under the
Gardiner suddenly echoes loud with meaning, as it was one of the
reasons Toronto grew as a city. The Grand Trunk connected Toronto to
Sarnia, where a ferry (enhanced in 1891 by a rail tunnel) crossed
the St. Clair River to Port Huron, Mich., allowing cargo to connect
by rail to Chicago, a big market for Toronto's industrial might.
Though there is a huge rail enthusiast community (just Google
anything railroad and see for yourself), the heritage here has not
yet been interpreted for the public.
As late as the 1950s, just before the Gardiner was constructed,
photos of the rail cut show a bucolic scene resembling rural Ontario
more than the centre of a great metropolis. Rail lines in general
tend to have a country feel, often with antique wooden electrical
poles and wild tall grasses and feral bushes. They are linear
countrysides surrounded by urban landscape.
This short part of the Grand Trunk cut can only be followed to about
Strachan Ave., and it won't be part of the new airport link. But
there are ghosts of the GTR on the GO Train's journey west to
Georgetown that will be, and that yet today demonstrate why the
Grand Trunk was indeed grand.
Toronto lies in a region of ravines, and the Grand Trunk's builders
had to build substantial bridges across wide valleys. Golfers at the
Weston Golf and Country Club in the Humber valley, just south of the
401, today tee off to greens below the Humber Viaduct, 170 metres
long and standing on eight piers 20 metres high, soaring today just
as it did in 1856. Further east, just outside of downtown
Georgetown, is the similar, 300-metre-longGrand River viaduct with
piers made of stone quarried nearby.
In his 1855 inspection report, Fred Cumberland Esq., chief engineer
of the Ontario, Simcoe and Huron Railway, wrote that they give "such
complete assurance to the mind of permanent stability." His words
ring true today, as these structures continue to serve as reminders
of the industrial foundations that this city and country were built
on, and are still rising from.
Shawn Micallef is senior editor at Spacing Magazine.

