“The U.S. continues to qualify the Canadian labour proposal as non-substantive, not serious. That means they have not shared it with their U.S.-cleared advisers,” said Christopher Monette, spokesman for Teamsters Canada.
Representatives from Teamsters Canada and
Unifor said Tuesday the proposed U.S. text on labour standards was
nothing more than a cut and paste of the failed 12-country
Trans-Pacific Partnership — one that labour unions had already
rejected as inadequate.
Both unions said they consulted with American
negotiators, whom they described as dismissive of the Canadian
initiative at the bargaining table.
They also met with Mexican officials to express
their concern over poor working conditions and low wages in that
country, and were rebuffed there too.
“The
U.S. continues to qualify the Canadian labour proposal as
non-substantive, not serious. That means they have not shared it
with their U.S.-cleared advisers,” said Christopher Monette,
spokesman for Teamsters Canada.
Canada and the U.S. have brought labour texts
to the bargaining table, but Mexico has not, said Monette.
The U.S. has shared its text with Teamsters
officials the U.S. and they describe it as “inadequate,” he said.
The Canadian proposal goes much farther and
addresses right-to-work laws in more than two dozen U.S. states that
give American workers the right to refuse to join a union but still
reap the benefits of a unionized workplace.
Canada wants enforceable, progressive labour
standards to be included in a rewritten NAFTA that would force
Mexico to pay workers higher wages and do away with so-called
“yellow” unions that represent employers rather than employees.
Canada and the U.S. are both concerned about
the exodus to Mexico of quality jobs and investment, particularly in
the automotive sector, where the minimum wage is less than $1 per
hour.
“Twenty-three years ago the argument was this
would allow the standard of living for Mexican workers to rise, and
here we are 23 years later and we still see minimum wage at 65 cents
an hour,” said Jerry Dias, the president of Unifor.
Teamsters and Unifor officials have backed the
Canadian position in their meetings with the U.S. and Mexico.
“I don’t think the Canadian team is thrilled
with it (the American text) because it falls short,” said Dias.
“I know that the labour movement in the United
States that was trying to push the American team to do the right
thing put forth progressive language ⦠and they didn’t
do that.”
Monette described the Mexicans as unreceptive
to the Teamsters entries. “We got the sense the Mexicans are facing
a strong pushback from their own business community regarding the
Canadian labour proposals, which is unfortunate.”
Dias said Canada should walk away from the
NAFTA renegotiation if it can’t make progress on labour because low
standards in Mexico have led to the shuttering of auto plants in
Canada and the U.S.
“You can’t sign a free trade deal where you’ve
already lost half a million manufacturing jobs. The United States
has lost a heck of a lot more than that. It’s clear where the
industry is investing — it’s crystal clear.”
The labour unrest comes as Foreign Affairs
Minister Chrystia Freeland welcomes her Mexican and American
counterparts to Ottawa Tuesday, as Round 3 of the NAFTA
renegotiation enters its final day.
Freeland is hosting U.S. Trade Representative
Robert Lighthizer and Mexican Economy Minister ldefonso Guajardo for
a dinner meeting Tuesday night on the eve of the final day of talks
in the national capital.
The third of seven planned rounds ends
Wednesday with the goal of finishing by the end of the year becoming
more elusive by the hour.
Freeland, Lighthizer and Guajardo hold a series
of meetings Wednesday, but the major issues will be pushed forward
into a fourth round in the coming weeks.
In addition to the disagreement over labour
standards, Canada’s chief negotiator has said he doesn’t expect
progress several other on hot topics.
They include the investor state dispute
settlement process, the fate of Canada’s supply-managed dairy and
poultry industry, and the U.S. demand for increase American content
in North American-manufactured automobiles.
Canada and the U.S. have also been forced to
fend off accusations that they are deliberately dragging their feet
at the talks.